breaking news

Growing divide between property values

2908 people have read this article
Thursday, 19 January 2012

Staff reporter

A new report has found that 43 per cent of all Australian homes are now worth more than twice the original purchase price – however not all Australian property owners have fared so well.

According to RP Data's latest Equity Report, capital city home values have increased by approximately 28 per cent in the last five years, despite the recent property price reductions, including a 3.3 per cent dip in home values over the last 12 months.

The report has revealed that the number of properties that are now worth less than their purchase price has risen to 5 per cent – up from 3.7 per cent at the end of the last quarter.

The divide between property that has increased in value and those that have dipped highlights the current patchwork property landscape. It also indicates that there are still areas of opportunity for buyers and investors looking to capitalise on a falling rate cycle and flat property market.

The worst instances of negative equity are in Far North Queensland, the Gold Coast and the Sunshine Coast at 20.2 per cent, 14 per cent and 13.5 per cent respectively. Western Australia's Lower Great Southern and South West and South Eastern regions are also showing high levels of negative equity.

The report found that capital cities have enjoyed longer-term value appreciation and have proven to be less susceptible to ongoing value falls than certain non-capital city markets.

RP Data's Tim Lawless said the Equity Report gives an estimate of equity accumulated across Australia's housing market.

"This is done by measuring the difference between the original purchase price of a home and the current valuation for individual properties around the country," Mr Lawless said.

E-mail
 

Comments  

 
-1 #2 PETER BAILEY 2012-01-20 11:32
Another rubbish report on property values with no substantiation. Values in FNQ are no doubt lower due to the effects of recent cyclones which have no doubt seen a change in buying cycles and some properties no longer being what they once were. The GC and SSC have and always will be fickle places and reflect the ups & downs of population migration. I note that there is no mention of the BIG value increases within Central QLD due to the demand generated by the resources sector...but then again these figures may have distorted the results the researcher was actually trying to achieve....Nothing new here
Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
-2 #1 Dennis 2012-01-19 10:23
I can't believe how stupid this commentary is. it takes no account of the money invested in improvements that might not be reflected in the increased value of the property. Neither does it take into account the date the property was purchased. Anyone who purchased a property in a metropolitan area more than 10 years ago will have benefited significantly more than someone who purchased in the last 5 years. The other matter that affects this comparison is region. If you bought a unit on the Gold Coast in 2007/8 the changes are that they have lost 40% or more. So let's cut out these stupid comparisons and remember that property investment is a long term proposition.
Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh