Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Aggregator

AFG prices largest RMBS transaction to date

6 minute read
The Adviser

The aggregation group has successfully priced its largest RMBS transaction to date, totalling $700 million.

Australian Finance Group (AFG) has priced a $700 million AFG 2020-1 trust residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) issue.

AFG CEO David Bailey said support from both domestic and international investors enabled the deal to “upsize” from $350 million to $700 million.

He welcomed the successful transaction at a time of dislocation in the market caused by the coronavirus pandemic.

 
 

“The strong support we received for the issue is evidence of the depth of the securitised business,” Mr Bailey said.

“Support that has enabled the company to issue $3.575 billion of paper into the market over the past seven years.”

The RMBS consists of:

  • A class A tranche totalling $612.5 million;
  • A class AB tranche totalling $49 million;
  • A class B tranche totalling $20.4 million;
  • A class C tranche totalling $7.6 million;
  • A class D tranche totalling $4.2 million;
  • A class E tranche totalling $2.8 million; and
  • A class F tranche totalling $3.5 million.

Commenting further on the RMBS transaction, Mr Bailey said: “As both an originator and a distributor of mortgages, our experience informs our lending practices.

“Disciplined lending criteria and active management of the portfolio has meant we are in a fortunate position to take our paper to market.

“Our portfolio, 100 per cent broker-introduced, has a track record of outstanding performance, and we are very pleased to see both new and return investor participation.”

Mr Bailey concluded by thanking AFG’s investors for their support.

The RMBS transaction, which is AFG’s largest to date, settles on 30 July.

This follows news of AFG signing a strategic partnership with 86 400 to give its brokers access to the neobank’s digital mortgage offering from next month.

The listed group is currently working through the courts on a deal that would see it merge with fellow aggregation group Connective. Recently, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission announced that it would not oppose the proposed $120-million merger. A combined AFG-Connective entity would cover around 40 per cent of the broker channel.

A final decision on the merger is not currently anticipated until after the second half of FY20. 

[Related: AFG prices $500m RMBS]

default

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!

Malavika Santhebennur

AUTHOR

Malavika Santhebennur is a content specialist at Momentum Media, focusing on mortgages and finance writing.

Before joining Momentum Media in 2019, Malavika held roles with Money Management and Benchmark Media, where she was writing about financial services.

Comments (3)

  • I think that the merger is a bad idea, unless Connective-AFG is mandated to accept any legitimate funder in the marketplace. Since a credit rep is limited to the options available through an aggregator, any steps by the aggregator to exclude any recognized and licensed funder becomes a market-limiting practice.

    In these days of BID, allowing an aggregator to limit the choices of its brokers to the funders the aggregator selects goes against the spirit and principle of free and open market competition. How do you meet BID, when you potentially are cut-off from access to what might be the best solution for your borrower? Are brokers really expected to turn-down business, because their aggregator chooses not to work with a particular funder for reasons other than compliance?

    Without a measure like this, the merger would keep those institutions not selected by the aggregation group from being able to access 40% of the broker sales channel, with this deal alone, not even counting the other aggregation companies with similar limitations.

    Certain aggregation firms with bank ties, for example, have eliminated some mortgage managers and non-banks from their panels, which limits the market and choices for brokers and borrowers alike. Having banks own any part of an aggregation company is a serious conflict-of-interest that the government seems to wilfully ignore.
    1
    • Or you could get your own ACL and put whoever you want on the panel. As a broker you can whinge about your aggregator or take control of your business and move forward, the choice is yours.
      0
      • Anon,

        That is true, but not everyone wants the responsibility, and new brokers can't get an ACL right-away.
        0
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
magazine
Read the latest issue of The Adviser magazine!
The Adviser is the number one magazine for Australia's finance and mortgage brokers. The publications delivers news, analysis, business intelligence, sales and marketing strategies, research and key target reports to an audience of professional mortgage and finance brokers
Read more
You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits