Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Borrower

White-label mortgages dominating the market

7 minute read
The Adviser

Brokers from a major aggregator wrote the same volume of branded home loans in November as they did for a major bank, reflecting the growing success of the group’s white-label offering.

The most recent AFG Competition Index shows that AFG Home Loans – the group’s branded white-label products – accounted for 8.23 per cent of all mortgages written in November. By contrast, Westpac received the same share of home loans over the month (8.23 per cent).

The popularity of AFG branded mortgages has risen dramatically over the last 12 months and has consistently outperformed all non-major lenders in terms of share of AFG broker-originated loans.

In December 2015 AFG Home Loans accounted for 5.52 per cent of all mortgages. In April 2016, AFG Home Loans commanded a 6.96 per cent share of all mortgages. This jumped to 7.33 per cent in June before reaching a high of 8.23 per cent in November.

 
 

Branded mortgages added $6.6 million in profit to the group over the 2016 financial year.

AFG has repeatedly stated that the core objective of its white-label business is to maintain multiple funding lines.

One of its major funders is Advantedge, a group that has been instrumental in the development of white-label lending in Australia.

Advantedge general manager Brett Halliwell said brokers have largely “jumped on board” with white-label lending over the last 12 months, which has led to a significant increase in volumes for the funder.

“In 2016 we really saw the absolute take-up of white-label lending. It has just been an absolute runaway success within the industry,” Mr Halliwell said.

In 2015 Advantedge rolled out a number of white-label offerings through its aggregation partners including FAST, Choice, PLAN and AFG.

“We're absolutely delighted to see that the take-up across all of those new aggregators, plus our existing partners, was very strong,” Mr Halliwell said.

“We hoped that it would be that strong and we hoped that it would be that positive, but I think that really sent a strong message that what we had set out to deliver to brokers, to deliver to their customers, means they understood it, they got it, they jumped on board,” he said.

“We're absolutely delighted with a very significant increase in volume across our business in general.”

[Related: Major broker's branded home loans surge 99% towards $2bn]

default

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!

James Mitchell

AUTHOR

James Mitchell has over eight years’ experience as a financial reporter and is the editor of Wealth and Wellness at Momentum Media.

He has a sound pedigree to cover the business of mortgages and the converging financial services sector having reported for leading finance titles InvestorDaily, InvestorWeekly, Accountants Daily, ifa, Mortgage Business, Residential Property Manager, Real Estate Business, SMSF Adviser, Smart Property Investment, and The Adviser.

He has also been published in The Daily Telegraph and contributed online to FST Media and Mergermarket, part of the Financial Times Group.

James holds a BA (Hons) in English Literature and an MA in Journalism.

 

Comments (4)

  • Possibly related to their internal incentives? ASIC review might change that.
    0
    • Or possibly related to the fact that Westpac isn't a very attractive lending option for most customers and white label lenders are actually trying to win business with good pricing and service.

      The real question is why are 8.23% of loans going to Westpac?

      I've got a white label Advantedge option and am unaware of any internal incentives.
      1
      • Agree with the Westpac statement, why do they still get such a high percentage these days?

        I'm not overly familiar with the Advantedge structure, but other than very good interest rates for the client aren't the commission splits different for their white label products? IE - 100/100?
        1
        • Is that what he was talking about (internal incentives)?

          They did have a Zero aggregator fee on settlement but recently stopped this (so now no difference with any other lender). Trail fees same as any lender.

          I personally can't see what is wrong with aggregators not charging a small fee for a loan they are already going to make money on.

          I'm sure you would agree, no half decent broker would recommend a white label product simply because the broker saved $140 (not that this is even on the table anymore)?
          0
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
magazine
Read the latest issue of The Adviser magazine!
The Adviser is the number one magazine for Australia's finance and mortgage brokers. The publications delivers news, analysis, business intelligence, sales and marketing strategies, research and key target reports to an audience of professional mortgage and finance brokers
Read more
You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits