Login
ISCOVER
A lobby group has attacked several “myths” surrounding negative gearing, including the widespread belief that scrapping the scheme in the 1980s led to higher rents.
The Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) said it was wrong to claim that the Hawke government's restrictions on negative gearing in the 1980s resulted in rent increases.
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Looking for more benefits? Become a Premium Member.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
Looking for more benefits? Become a Premium Member.
“The main reasons for rent increases at that time were higher interest rates and a share market boom which diverted investment from rental property,” the council said in a recent report.
“Even so, this only happened in Sydney and Perth. Lending to rental property investors still rose by 42 per cent across Australia.”
ACOSS said negative gearing and capital gains tax together cost the Budget $7 billion a year and fuel housing price booms.
Chief executive Cassandra Goldie said negative gearing is “shrouded in myth” that need to be dispelled so a “sensible discussion” can begin.
"Negative gearing and the tax break for capital gains don't improve housing affordability; they make it worse by fuelling home price booms like the one in Sydney right now,” she said.
“Less than one tenth of negatively geared housing investments are for new properties, the other nine tenths bid up the price of existing housing."
Ms Goldie said it is also false to claim that negative gearing mainly benefits ‘mum and dad' investors on middle incomes.
"The reality is that over half of geared housing investors are in the top 10 per cent of personal taxpayers and 30 per cent earn more than $500,000,” she said.
"This is a longstanding problem and it's time it was fixed,” she added.
[Related: Make property investment less appealing, says lender]
