Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Aggregator

Broker sued by aggregator in loan fraud case

6 minute read
The Adviser

A leading mortgage industry lawyer has warned brokers of the shortcomings of professional indemnity insurance following a recent case in which an aggregator sued a broker over a fraudulent home loan.

Speaking to The Adviser, Bransgroves Lawyers founding partner Matthew Bransgrove said he recently consulted a broker who was being sued by their aggregator pursuant to an indemnity clause in the aggregation agreement.

“The aggregator was suing the broker for indemnity because the bank was suing the aggregator. The bank was suing the aggregator because a mortgage had been forged,” Mr Bransgrove said. “The brokers’ PI insurers were refusing to cover the claim because the broker was said to have contracted out of proportionate liability legislation by giving the indemnity to the aggregator.”

It is understood the broker was unaware that documents provided by the client were fraudulent.

 
 

Fraud is a common out for PI insurers. Mr Bransgrove explained that if a broker certifies a document that contains a false statement the PI insurer can allege that it was done knowingly and therefore fraudulently.

“Once fraud is established the policy does not answer. Usually the line between actual fraud and negligence is blurred. The insurer says, ‘no reasonable person would have not realised there was a fraud going on, you must have known, therefore we will not cover’,” he said.

The situation was unfortunate not just for the broker, but also for the aggregator; the main recourse an aggregator has against a broker, other than direct recourse to the trail book, is indirect recourse to the broker’s PI policy.

“For this reason, it makes sense for aggregators to be less onerous towards brokers in their aggregation agreements,” Mr Bransgrove said.

The lawyer urged all brokers to review their policies and negotiate better cover.

[Related: Mortgage fraud a real threat to brokers]

default

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!

James Mitchell

AUTHOR

James Mitchell has over eight years’ experience as a financial reporter and is the editor of Wealth and Wellness at Momentum Media.

He has a sound pedigree to cover the business of mortgages and the converging financial services sector having reported for leading finance titles InvestorDaily, InvestorWeekly, Accountants Daily, ifa, Mortgage Business, Residential Property Manager, Real Estate Business, SMSF Adviser, Smart Property Investment, and The Adviser.

He has also been published in The Daily Telegraph and contributed online to FST Media and Mergermarket, part of the Financial Times Group.

James holds a BA (Hons) in English Literature and an MA in Journalism.

 

Comments (7)

  • So if an Aggregator has to cover their arse against Lenders, then their contracts with Mortgage Brokers are in their favour. This is a great opportunity for the FBAA to assist its members in assisting them with their Aggregator contracts. I haven't mentioned the MFAA because there is simply too much conflict as they represent Banks, Insurance Companies and Mortgage Brokers, so you would never be able to tell if you were getting really good advice/assistance from the MFAA.
    What I have noticed over my time is the fact that no Aggregator has clearly defined exit strategies for Mortgage Brokers that allows a Mortgage Broker to 'run off' their trail book. Again this works in the Aggregators favour who at any stage can just decide to stop paying trail.
    System is rigged and the bigger the business the more they get to take from the worker.
    0
  • Can you please ask Bransgrove what we should be negotiating in our PI policies please. It isn't clear to me
    0
  • placeholder="Enter Friday, 26 May 2017
    My PI is a policy that my aggregator has put in place. The company that supplies this PI policy also does so for a lot of aggregators as well as the MFAA (not sure about the FBAA). I would imagine a large selection of brokers all have the same supplier, I wonder if all these policies are the same or do they have separate clauses. A follow up from Mr Bransgrove with more detail around this issue would be great. The other question is what was the lose to the bank? In a raising market and with say a 10% deposit careful management of the sale process surely would have netted them their balance. Interesting, certainly scope for more information.
    0
  • Who was the Insurer?
    0
  • good when your agg says - hey use our insurer for your PI. NO conflict to get a kickback on the premium and then sue the broker for something out of their control.
    1
  • Typical kick the little guy
    1
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
You have3 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits
You have 3 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits