Login
ISCOVER
Loan Market head Sam White has joined the call for a more equitable application of net of offset reforms that better align with clawback arrangements.
Last week, Connective director Mark Haron noted the impact of contrasting remuneration policies adopted by the lenders off the back of the Combined Industry Forum’s move to limit the upfront commission paid to brokers to the amount drawn down by borrowers (net of offset).
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Looking for more benefits? Become a Premium Member.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
Looking for more benefits? Become a Premium Member.
Mr Haron said that some lenders had opted to withhold the payment of commission for additional funds arranged by a broker, which are utilised by a borrower after a pre-determined period post-settlement.
The Connective director added that the disparity in the application of the CIF reforms had increased risks of “lender choice conflicts”, which could hinder compliance with the newly proposed best interests duty.
In a statement to The Adviser, Loan Market’s executive chairman, Sam White, also noted his concerns with existing net of offset arrangements.
Mr White has called for an arrangement that better aligns with existing clawback provisions, which, under the federal government’s newly proposed bill, would limit the clawback period to two years.
“Our belief is that net of offset should mirror clawback provisions,” Mr White said.
“If it is good enough for banks to claw back the money over two years, it should also be good enough to increase the upfronts over that same time period.”
Like Mr Haron, Mr White revealed that Loan Market would also be lobbying for reform to existing net of offset arrangements as part of the consultation process for the government’s best interests duty bill.
“We will be including recommendations for net of offset and clawback in our submission to Treasury,” he said.
“We are currently consulting brokers across the country before we formalise our position.”
The push for reforms to net of offset policies follow the release of the Mortgage & Finance Association of Australia’s Industry Intelligence Service report, which revealed that, over the six months to March 2019, the national average annual gross value of commissions collected per broker dropped by 3 per cent when compared to the previous corresponding period, falling to a historic low of $128,709.
The decline was driven by a 10.6 per cent fall in the average upfront commission received by a broker, down from $75,604 to $67,554 – offset by a 6.9 per cent increase in the average annual gross trail commission received per broker, from $57,189 to $61,155.
Reductions in commission revenue have also prompted calls from both industry associations and aggregators for “fair and equitable” clawback arrangements.
Mr Haron and the Australian Finance Group’s head of industry and partnerships, Mark Hewitt, recently indicated that they would be lobbying for clawback reform during the consultation period for the federal government’s proposed best interests duty bill.
[Related: Aggregator head laments bank response to rem reform]
