Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Broker

Veteran broker challenges offset account paradigm

7 minute read
The Adviser

A mortgage broker with over 30 years’ experience in financial services has challenged the widely held belief that you should always have an offset account for your clients.

Recent regulatory changes have effectively created a “tiered market”, according to Choice Home Loans broker John Tindall, who believes recent price changes have had a significant impact on mortgage offset accounts that has not yet been fully realised.

“For many years the traditional thinking was that almost all clients should have an offset account,” Mr Tindall told The Adviser.

“The regulatory changes have now introduced a tiered market,” he said. “So if I look at my own aggregator’s white-label product, ChoiceLend, an interest-only combination (fixed and variable) three-year investment loan with under 80 per cent LVR equates to about 4.5 per cent."

 
 

The equivalent products with other major lenders are about 20 to 25 basis points more expensive, Mr Tindall said.

“If the average loan size is more than $500,000, then the other major bank equivalents are $1,000 more expensive a year.

“In other words, the before-tax cost of a loan with an offset facility could exceed $1,000 a year,” he said.

Mr Tindall argues that in the first few years of a loan’s life, the borrower has probably maximised their borrowing. As a result, they don’t have a lot of surplus capital to put into an offset account.

“For investment lending, it would make better sense to go for the cheapest loan available on the first few years and then switch to an offset when clients have potentially more surplus income and can dedicate the surplus capital onto the offset account,” he said.

Offset account balances currently amount to around $90 billion, or six per cent of housing loans outstanding, according to the Reserve Bank of Australia.

In its August Statement on Monetary Policy, the RBA noted that offset account balances have been growing by approximately 30 per cent annually over recent years.

“This growth has the potential to continue as older loans that are less likely to have offset accounts are replaced with new loans, where it is more common to have an offset account,” the RBA said.

However, Mr Tindall’s analysis shows that new borrowers might be better off choosing the cheapest loan without an offset facility in the early years, then switching to a product with an offset account when their surplus income has increased.

“This argument seems stronger the less spare income/capital the client has,” he said.

“I think the common wisdom around offset accounts has changed and [that] has not been fully realised.”

[Related: Surge in mortgage offset accounts to continue]

default

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!

James Mitchell

AUTHOR

James Mitchell has over eight years’ experience as a financial reporter and is the editor of Wealth and Wellness at Momentum Media.

He has a sound pedigree to cover the business of mortgages and the converging financial services sector having reported for leading finance titles InvestorDaily, InvestorWeekly, Accountants Daily, ifa, Mortgage Business, Residential Property Manager, Real Estate Business, SMSF Adviser, Smart Property Investment, and The Adviser.

He has also been published in The Daily Telegraph and contributed online to FST Media and Mergermarket, part of the Financial Times Group.

James holds a BA (Hons) in English Literature and an MA in Journalism.

 

Comments (22)

  • <p>Yes Troy - 100% certain. Any tax accountant will confirm that any principal payment into a loan is considered by the ATO as a debt reduction, irrespective of whether it is an owner-occupied loan or an investment loan, and that any subsequent redraw, however small, is considered "new borrowing". If someone moves out of an owner-occupier and makes it an investment property, in the event of a tax audit, any redraw transactions must pass the "Purpose Test" in order for the resulting interest cost to be deemed deductible. If a borrower draws say, $50k out of advance payments in a basic rate loan in order to provide a deposit for an owner-occupied purchase, then the Purpose Test has been failed, and the resulting rise in the interest bill cannot be claimed for tax purposes. If however, the client draws the same amount and invests in shares for example, then the Purpose Test has been passed.</p><p>Any savings held in an offset account produce exactly the same interest outcome during the owner occupied period (assuming the same interest rate), but when those funds are withdrawn to cover the deposit on the purchase, the resulting rise in interest can be claimed because funds have been drawn from a savings account not a loan account, and therefore, the Purpose Test only applies to the balance of the loan now being claimed as deductible.</p>
    0
  • <p>Well considered Brisbane broker. Are you 100% certain in your conclusion that redrawing additional capital payments are considered a loan by the ATO? It seems unusual were this the case.</p>
    0
  • <p>Which is exactly why the strategy of having all your pay going into an offset and all your expenses coming out is a terrible idea for most people, but that's not why offset accounts were invented in the first place. They were invented because of our unusual tax system which doesn't allow redraw on a loan to be used as a tax deduction, if the property becomes an investment and the redraw wasn't used for the purchase, or improvement of that property, or another investment property. Used as somewhere to save for your next o/o purchase is perfect, with P&amp;I equivalent repayments at 7.5% going into your "long term savings offset" and interest only repayments coming out, will put many clients in a wonderful position to upgrade their property and keep the current as an investment. Paying off and redrawing the funds for the deposit will not.</p>
    0
  • <p>I often wonder how many brokers understand this ^^^^^<br>Strategy over transactional everytime</p>
    0
  • <p>Turning your OO home into an investment seems to happen more often these days. I would suggest talking to accountants like Chan &amp; Naylor and discuss structuring to produce the best tax effective outcomes for the client.</p>
    0
  • <p>Agree. Borrowers love the idea of an offset. But when I explain the mathematics in the initial phases of the loan with very small balances they think again.</p>
    0
  • <p>Thanks Brisbane but as I said in my bit it comes down to clients requirements. If the client has that type of mind frame to buy new down the track and keep existing- then fine I would recommend getting an offset. I'm not against them, they certainly have their place BUT some brokers put all clients into an offset arrangement which ends up costing the client more in the long run. Remove your blinkers.</p>
    0
  • <p>Catherine, if you have a client who is even remotely thinking of turning their first home into an investment property in the future, then an offset account will give them a significantly better tax outcome into the future. If they make advance payments into a basic rate loan, then try to redraw them to provide the deposit on a new O/O home, then the redrawn amount will be considered 'new borrowings' by the ATO, and if the purpose is for an O/O purchase, then that amount will not be tax deductible, and the deductible interest will be based on the minimum balance of the home loan since draw-down. However, those same funds, when stored in an offset account, can be used without the need to pass the ATO's purpose test. The offset account therefore gives your client options into the future, which are denied them with a basic rate loan. They may simply sell the home and upgrade - fine - but they will be in a better tax position if decide to keep it, so if the cost is the same (or potentially, significantly less as 'Michael' has noted this morning) then why not offer an offset account?</p>
    0
  • <p>So a variable home loan with a rate of 3.99% with an offset account and a yearly fee of $199 plus a bit of education for the client on how to use it effectively is no good then? I need more experience.</p>
    0
  • <p>The only reason why Mr Tindall has convinced himself that Offset Accounts may not be the best solution is because Advantedge, the funder of ChoiceLend does not do them... and then compares a white label offering to a major bank.<br>Resimac Platinum, my white label product, through my Aggregator Finsure, I can deliver @ 80% LVR Loan Amount &gt;$500k an Interest Rate of 4.14% that comes with a FREE 100% Offset Account, $0 monthly fee, $0 annual fee and $0 ongoing transaction costs.<br>Every client I have met who has an Offset Account that their bank has set up, does not use it properly, and their bank has not taught their customer how they work or how to have it working in their favour, but then again Bank staff are working for their shareholders, not their customers...<br>Bottom line, if the Offset Account does NOT go UP every month (equivalent to watching a standard loan go down every month) then the Offset Account is a waste of time.<br>If the client has on average a set amount sitting in the Offset Account, meaning, for example, 'on average I always try and have $5,000 sitting in my Offset Account', again, this is a waste of time.<br>Salary Crediting and paying bills out of the Offset Account essentially works like a Line of Credit, which we all know 95% of borrowers do not manage well because they can't easily tell how much they are paying off their loan, what money is theirs to spend and what isn't.<br>I teach my clients to make a Loan Repayment into their Offset Account from their Savings Account, an automated transfer the day after they get paid. And if they 'service' at 7.50% then they can afford to pay more than the standard P&amp;I repayment, so I get my clients, at a minimum, to pay 1 extra P&amp;I repayment per year spread across their pay frequency. So now they watch their Offset Account go up every month, guaranteeing debt reduction.<br>After 6 months, once they can see the structure working I then discuss adding their Long Term Expenses to their Loan Repayment. We all have to collect their Living Expenses and the easy ones to add are the Utilities, Insurances and Car Registration. So if they spend $6,000 per year on these expenses divided by 26 fortnights to match their pay frequency I now get them to add $231 per fortnight to their Loan Repayment and when the bill comes due, redraw from the Offset and go pay the bill.<br>The money remaining in their Savings Account essentially covers their food, fuel and lifestyle expenses and like most people, they will spend what they earn, which doesn't matter because we have secured their loan repayment, repaying extra to build equity for their future and set aside money to cover their Long Term Expenses, so in the future they are never caught short of funds when the Car Rego, Electricity Bill and Council Rates all become payable at the same time...<br>And none of my clients receive a Debit Card with their Offset Account because I don't want to see their Home Loan turned into an ATM machine, a recipe for disaster...</p>
    0
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
magazine
Read the latest issue of The Adviser magazine!
The Adviser is the number one magazine for Australia's finance and mortgage brokers. The publications delivers news, analysis, business intelligence, sales and marketing strategies, research and key target reports to an audience of professional mortgage and finance brokers
Read more
You have3 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits
You have 3 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits