Conflicting evidence has confused the debate about whether the market is cooling or will continue booming.
Deloitte’s annual Australian Mortgage Report has made the case for increases in both supply and demand.
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Looking for more benefits? Become a Premium Member.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
Looking for more benefits? Become a Premium Member.
The report said Sydney and Melbourne should experience continued strong price growth in 2015 due to an increase in investor demand, foreign student numbers and migrant numbers.
Low interest rates and easy access to credit will also encourage further mortgage borrowing, according to the report.
“Measures of mortgage stress remain well below their average over the last decade. This suggests that households can afford to borrow more, although there is vulnerability if interest rates increase,” it said.
However, Deloitte also said that there is a “big lift in housing supply coming through the pipeline”, which will give property buyers more choice and restrain prices.
“This improvement in housing construction activity may extend into 2015 and beyond with state governments working to reduce supply side constraints,” the report said.
As property prices rise, building a new home increasingly makes more sense than buying an established property, according to Deloitte.
“Combined with other favourable conditions – low interest rates, population growth, inducements for first home buyers and overseas investment, particularly from China – there are many factors driving higher levels of housing construction at present,” it said.
Deloitte said weak underlying income growth stemming from the soft labour market would also restrain housing price gains.
“The very strong rises in house prices already recorded – particularly in Sydney and Melbourne – are also beginning to stretch valuations in terms of rental yields for investors, as well as affordability for first home buyers.” the report said.
[Related: Landmark report sparks commissions debate]