Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Growth

New valuation rules 'dropped like a bombshell'

7 minute read
The Adviser

A Queensland broker has expressed his frustration after failing to secure finance for off-the-plan purchasers following the Australian Property Institute’s (API's) new standing instructions for valuers.

New inspection requirements came into effect last week (28 September) as part of the Australian Banking and Finance Industry's (AFBI's) standing instructions for residential valuations.

The new instructions make it clear that all valuers must physically inspect a site that has been pegged for residential development.

According to an API source, valuers previously had to exercise “a bit of guesswork” when valuing land for lenders financing off-the-plan properties, particularly if they were unable to access the plot or the site had not been pegged.

 
 

The source told The Adviser that the ABFI  group decided this was no longer to take place, with banks primarily leading the push for stricter valuation procedures. The ABFI is made up of mortgage insurers, lenders, major valuation firms and the API.

While the banks look to mitigate risk, brokers are struggling to secure finance for their clients when a valuation cannot be made.

Go Mortgage Corporation director Xavier Quenon told The Adviser  that the new guidelines have been “dropped on us like a bombshell”.

Mr Quenon writes a sizeable amount of finance for off-the-plan house and land packages from large developers like Mirvac and Lend Lease. Until Monday last week it was business as usual, he said.

Now valuers are telling him the same sites cannot be priced.

“To give you an idea, I’ve got four packages in Branxton in the Hunter Valley to finance,” Mr Quenon said. “Two of them obtained a valuation last week, so they’re fine. We can get the loan lodged and approved and go to formal and exchange. But the two others we ordered the valuation this week and they are telling us they can’t value them. All four lots are in the same place.”

Mr Quenon said he now has the same issue with Lend Lease land packages in Redbank Plains, Queensland.

“I have had most valuation firms like Herrod Todd White and CBRE come back with the exact same speech,” he said. “According to the new API guidelines they are not able to go on the land and sight the block because it is not pegged.”

Mr Quenon said he has spoken to builders and lenders that were unaware of the changes.

“How many blows are we trying to put on the property market before we crash the economy here?” he said. “Between APRA, ASIC and now the API, they are putting too much pressure and implementing too many changes. They are going to break the system.”

Mr Quenon fears the new API guidelines will lead to “thousands of pieces of stock that are suddenly in limbo”.

With homebuyers unable to secure finance and exchange until the valuation comes in, the impact on developers could be significant, Mr Quenon said. “Nobody will want to do pre-sales, which impacts developers obtaining finance.”

Mr Quenon said the ramifications for first homebuyers could be huge as those looking to use the FHOG must purchase new or off-the-plan stock. 

[Related: Brokers demand upfront valuations from non-majors]

default

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!

James Mitchell

AUTHOR

James Mitchell has over eight years’ experience as a financial reporter and is the editor of Wealth and Wellness at Momentum Media.

He has a sound pedigree to cover the business of mortgages and the converging financial services sector having reported for leading finance titles InvestorDaily, InvestorWeekly, Accountants Daily, ifa, Mortgage Business, Residential Property Manager, Real Estate Business, SMSF Adviser, Smart Property Investment, and The Adviser.

He has also been published in The Daily Telegraph and contributed online to FST Media and Mergermarket, part of the Financial Times Group.

James holds a BA (Hons) in English Literature and an MA in Journalism.

 

Comments (10)

  • <p>Thanks, your comments are greatly appreciated. </p>
    0
  • <p>Thanks for comments. I am confused though as the lot is pegged. Think i will play it safe though and just wait for a regustered block. </p>
    0
  • <p>Vanessa, Don't do it! <br>I suggest you should be very cautious waiving any finance condition without a valuation. Even if the developer accepts the conditional finance subject to a valuation, what will you do if the property does not value up to the purchase price? <br>Unless you have cash to take up any shortfall in valuation, then do not go ahead. I am also noticing that valuers providing valuations in new estates are returning low valuations due to not having sufficient pre-sales in the new area or perhaps from fear of numerous properties being released at the same time or even potential two-tiered marketing ... whatever the reason ... don't take the risk unless you have and Unconditional Finance offer! <br>How about the developer does a little more work to define the asset you are purchasing? ... I think that is a reasonable request to ask for the lot to be pegged ... don't you?</p>
    0
  • <p>Vanessa, there is no point trying a different lender for two reasons. Firstly, your broker has virtually no control over the valuer chosen, as the order is simply distributed by Valex/CoreLogic to a valuation company on a rotational basis. Some lenders still use a panel of approved valuers but your broker cannot elect which one to use. In fact, even going to a different lender, there is a possibility that you will finish up with the same valuer. This happened to me after a low val recently and rather than challenging the val, which takes a lot of time and effort, the client wanted to try with a different lender, but we got the same valuer and the second bank, though sympathetic, was powerless to do anything about it. I was told to withdraw the val order, then re-issue it, and to keep doing this, until it went to a different valuer.</p><p>Secondly, the new standing orders apply to all valuers, so they should all apply the new rules in the same way. This means different bank, different valuer, same outcome.</p><p>The solution is to approach the agent representing the developer and advise that a formal approval is not possible until it can be valued. Some of the more unscrupulous agents will tell you that others have already gone unconditional on their contracts, but this is either a bluff, or those clients are paying cash, or using finance secured by equity in other properties. Remember, they will be well aware of the problems occurring and will be under instruction from their higher ups to be flexible.</p><p>In general, the bank will proceed with your application and will issue an approval, conditional on a successful valuation. Evidence of this, i.e. with no conditions except a val, will usually be sufficient for the developer.</p>
    0
  • <p>I was told today by my broker CBA cant approve my loan because the land can't be valued because of this change. The block is in Stage 3 of a subdivision, has been pegged but no road construction yet. This stage is accessible by a dirt road/track so you can get to it and identify the lots. Should I try a different lender?</p>
    0
  • <p>Not sure what the fuss is about? Some Banks have had this policy in place for years notwithstanding the fact that app's slip through to Approval regardless on occasions. As a professional assisting my Clients with finance, i have no problem with the Bank requiring the Lot to be physically identified. 40% of our business is Land/Construction finance and we obtain a formally validated pre-approval for every single Client that goes under Contract. No Developer that refers regular business to us (Stockland &amp; Lend Lease in QLD) has an issue extending finance on this basis. If you explain it properly to them, and the ramifications if you 'bark' too hard ie Land ends up being treated as 'off the plan' akin to Unit developments (no proper Valuation/Formal until fully completed), and no-one wants that! Another pertinent issue is that the longer it takes to get a Val done on Land, the less the likelihood of a Valuation shortfall, as this gives more time for comparable sales data to hit the databases. As for the ramifications for 1st home Buyers... really?! Storm in a tea cup...</p>
    0
  • <p>So how long would it take to peg out the blocks. No time at all if the developer could see a long term hold on their investment making a return.</p>
    0
  • <p>It seems a bit ridiculous that they haven't actually notified the lenders of the changes considering they are the major client to the valuers.</p>
    0
  • <p>this would seem a little bit of overkill. surely valuers are professional enough to work off contracts????</p>
    0
  • <p>Well the developers will just have to peg the blocks. Problem solved.</p>
    0
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
magazine
Read the latest issue of The Adviser magazine!
The Adviser is the number one magazine for Australia's finance and mortgage brokers. The publications delivers news, analysis, business intelligence, sales and marketing strategies, research and key target reports to an audience of professional mortgage and finance brokers
Read more
You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits