Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Growth

Industry urged to get on the front foot of trail messaging

10 minute read
The Adviser

Suncorp’s CEO of banking and wealth has said it is “beholden of all parties in the industry” to “think about the behaviours” that caused the concern raised during the banking royal commission and “address them” before the review in three years’ time.

Speaking during a panel discussion at Suncorp’s Synergy Series event in Sydney on Wednesday (24 July), the CEO of banking and wealth, David Carter, along with the CEO of insurance, Gary Dransfield, and Suncorp’s executive general manager intermediaries, Andrew Mair, reflected on some of the changes in the finance industry in the recent past and discussed some of the key issues facing the finance industry moving forward.

During the course of the panel, Mr Carter noted the royal commission’s focus on broker remuneration – particularly in regard to trail commission – and the political response to the final report recommendations.

The banking and wealth CEO said the fact that broker remuneration became such a big topic of conversation “took [him] by complete surprise” given “what else was being heard [during the hearings]”.

 
 

He added that the fact that the royal commission’s final recommendations were so radical showed that the people who critique the industry often “have a very limited understanding of the client of an adviser or a broker”.

Despite this, he warned that because the “very educated people” of the royal commission did not seem to understand the value of trail commission, it was therefore doubly important that the industry worked hard to ensure that the messaging around commissions was clear and easy for the average person to understand.

Indeed, the panel warned that as government and regulator action was often brought in to “address the lowest common denominator” or the worst potential outcomes, any behaviours or risks that threatened the commission model needed to be stamped out before the Council of Financial Regulators and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission review the impacts of removing trail and the feasibility of continuing upfront commission payments in three years’ time.

Mr Carter therefore called on the industry associations, professional brokers and industry as a whole to work to identify and eliminate the behaviours that concerned the royal commission around commission-based remuneration models, and “think about what you have to do to explain to the minority of people who don’t get it”.

Likewise, Mr Mair said the industry needed to “get crisper in explaining what people are doing for trail commission or renewal commission” given some participants were still unclear of its utility. He urged delegates to provide transparency on “what you are getting and what you are doing for it” and work to ensure these messages are heard sooner rather than later.

“Don’t think of it as a review in three years’ time,” Mr Mair said, “you will need to prepare earlier.”

Speaking to The Adviser following the panel, Mr Carter elaborated: “The behaviours that were highlighted during the royal commission process caused people to focus very much on remuneration and I think it is beholden on all parties in the industry to really spend some time and think about the behaviours that caused concern about commission-based remuneration models and address them.

“I think that goes to professional standards. I think that goes to real consequences for people who aren’t behaving well. I think that goes to remuneration structures where commission is used as well as other incentive models, and I think it goes to the behaviour of aggregators and brokers in demonstrating that the basis of the recommendation had nothing to do with the way they were going to get paid either in hard dollars or soft dollars,” he said.

Looking at ongoing payments, such as trail, Mr Carter noted that the royal commission had specifically asked what the value of trail was to the customer and “were unclear or found it very difficult to understand what value someone was getting several years later and why someone should be paying for that”.

“Whilst that was more directly asked of mortgage broking and implicitly – if not explicitly – around financial advisers, I do think the general insurance broking world will also have to make sure they’ve addressed the same question,” he added.

Suncorp’s banking and wealth CEO went on to say that he believed the Coalition government’s backflip on the immediate future of commissions (which he joked was “worthy of Olympic diving” and “highlights the fickleness of retail politics”) was “a rational outcome” because “so many people use brokers and the consequences of getting it wrong is, therefore, significant”.

“But,” he concluded, “I do think it is important for everyone in the sector to think about why it became a topic of conversation in the first place.”

While the conversation around broker commissions has quietened down following the Coalition government’s election win (and its pledge to kick out the remuneration review to three years’ time), the CEO of Mortgage Choice recently suggested that she supported reforms to existing clawback arrangements to help offset losses incurred by brokers who – as per the banking royal commission’s recommendation – will no longer be permitted to charge borrowers that have refinanced or defaulted on their home loan within the clawback period.

Speaking to The Adviser earlier this month, Ms Mitchell said that while she believes the industry is “stuck” with clawbacks, arrangements could be reformed to ensure that lenders bear a larger portion of the loss in the first year of a loan term.   

“Unfortunately, because it fits within an overall remuneration structure, we’re kind of stuck with clawbacks,” she said. “But I think the important thing is to make it fairer for the broker,” she said.

[Related: ‘Trail commission not dead’: MFAA]

default

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!

AUTHOR

Annie Kane is the managing editor of Momentum's mortgage broking title, The Adviser.

As well as leading the editorial strategy, Annie writes news and features about the Australian broking industry, the mortgage market, financial regulation, fintechs and the wider lending landscape.

She is also the host of the Elite Broker, New Broker, Mortgage & Finance Leader, Women in Finance and In Focus podcasts and The Adviser Live webcasts. 

Annie regularly emcees industry events and awards, such as the Better Business Summit, the Women in Finance Summit as well as other industry events.

Prior to joining The Adviser in 2016, Annie wrote for The Guardian Australia and had a speciality in sustainability.

She has also had her work published in several leading consumer titles, including Elle (Australia) magazine, BBC Music, BBC History and Homes & Antiques magazines.  

Comments (12)

  • Suncorp needs to learn how to run their own business before they start handing out advice to brokers. It is no surprise that they do not understand what trail is or how it came about. Worst. Lender. Ever.
    0
  • Trail needs to be renamed to reflect what it is - a deferral of upfront commission
    2
  • Maybe the powers that be need to actually consult brokers at the coalface to see what we do for the remuneration including all the "unpaid" work which would be at least 50% of the workload as a broker.
    1
  • I would like to see the consent forms we all need signed, to actually have some validation. Presently we as brokers can arrange multimillion dollar debt facilities for our clients, but we cant request a statement of account or make minor (non transactional) changes to an account/direct debit/general maintenance. If we could service our clients with more ease instead of being blocked with the old 'im sorry you will need the client to call us or come into a branch' due to privacy reasons (which we have been given permission by virtue of the consent form) Life would be a lot easier.

    My second observation is that this all became a topic of conversation when the Commissioner was besotted by the CEO of Commonwealth Bank and his testimony that his bank was spending too much money on broker commissions, and that his poor bank would lose its dominant market position if it went out on a limb and changed the remuneration formula, without the support of his competitors. At this point the Commissioner set aside his charter of investigating banking misconduct, and fell on the side of aiding the banking sector to punish consumers for seeking out a higher level of competition.
    9
    • I just asked ME Bank if I could request an Interest Rate Review on behalf of a new client I met with. (I didn't write their existing loans). A P&I home loan with an interest rate of 5.07% < 80% LVR prior to RBA rate reductions, so in theory now 4.67%.
      The response, "For all existing ME home Low rate review, the customer will need to call our retention team on 13 1563 option 4."

      I wasn't asking to be paid or have the trail commission transferred to me. All I wanted to do is negotiate with ME Bank a better interest rate for 'their' customer because they were clearly being ripped off...
      Just like you say Julian, we can write a home loan, talk to the BDM and/or Credit Staff but cannot act in the best interest of the client outside of writing a loan, can't do our job to the best of our ability, even when we receive $0 income for the service.
      ME Bank's reply is simply anti-Mortgage Broker.
      Our industry is riddled with incompetent processes, profit greedy lenders and moving further away from common sense.
      1
  • I said this 10 years ago and I will say it again. If we were paid a standard upfront & trail across all the lenders, this would go a long way to squash any perceived conflicts and would (virtue signal) to the elites (politicians & bureaucrats) that it's not remuneration that drives broker behaviour to one lender or another. I hear the arguments against, but after the fight of our lives over the past 6 months, i'll make whatever changes to appease these elites so they leave us alone to focus on our clients and our business.
    4
  • 2 key points -
    1. the issues raised by and the specific case studies referenced by the Royal Commission were in some cases 10 years old and took place under a completely different and lax regulating regime. e.g Lender BDM's recommending "how to get a loan across the board" We all know that conduct such as that is clearly not the case in 2019
    2. The Royal commission (conveniently perhaps ) failed to recognise that trail was established to spread a proportion of the upfront of 1.25 % over the life of the loan!
    7
  • Dan Da Silva, Cycam Thursday, 25 July 2019
    We're preparing a Paper/Study to Raise Fees to Mortgage Broking Sector. The issue is bigger than Trails.

    Mortgage Brokers (MBs) are critical not only to Customers, but also to Lenders, where they currently provide a highly-cost effective & significant range of services: Origination, Assessments, Processing & Customer Management. Most non-Bank Lenders / Fintechs would fold without MB Origination / Distribution Channels. Consequently, MBs have much more power than they think. Contact me - LinkedIn - to engage & comment directly.
    2
  • stephen mcclatchie Thursday, 25 July 2019
    Suncorp don't seem to get it either. Trail commission in the mortgage space was originally bought in to help the banks retain customers and limit the churn of loans regularly. This was mentioned as a potential problem back in the late 90's, then banks came in with a deferred upfront model and paid brokers over a period of time and not all upfront. This will help the broker keep the client with the same bank as well and service the client when required. If the model goes back to all upfront, I'm sure we will see a very large increase in movement after the clawback period is finished. This could help teh client and broker but won't help the banks/lenders.
    1
    • "Suncorp don't seem to get it either. Trail commission in the mortgage space was originally bought in to help the banks retain customers and limit the churn of loans regularly." AAARRRGGG incorrect. Trail was brought in originally to help banks fund using brokers. Half upfront and the balance on the drip feed. Came into play in the mid 90's. Nothing to do with churn originally that was added as a stick by the banks further down the track.
      3
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
magazine
Read the latest issue of The Adviser magazine!
The Adviser is the number one magazine for Australia's finance and mortgage brokers. The publications delivers news, analysis, business intelligence, sales and marketing strategies, research and key target reports to an audience of professional mortgage and finance brokers
Read more
You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits