Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Lender

Make property investment less appealing, says lender

6 minute read
The Adviser

Demands for negative gearing reform have recently come from an unlikely source – a mortgage lender.

HomeStart Finance, a first home buyer specialist owned by the South Australian government, has responded to the release of last week’s tax discussion paper by calling for negative gearing to be changed – but not scrapped.

Chief executive John Oliver said the discussion paper provided an important opportunity to explore how elements of the tax system were impacting on the property market.

“Capital gains tax discounts and negative gearing have both been blamed for creating more investor activity and driving up property prices,” Mr Oliver said.

 
 

“If you wanted to reduce housing demand and slow the growth of house prices, you could make a very strong case that abolishing negative gearing would go a long way to achieving that.”

Mr Oliver said there was a risk that modifying negative gearing benefits could reduce the supply of rental properties in the market, which would push up rents.

“The solution may lie somewhere in-between, where negative gearing isn’t scrapped entirely but is modified in some way to make buying a home as an investment less appealing,” he said.

“This may achieve a middle ground where there is sufficient investor activity in the housing market balanced with a clear pathway into home ownership for first home buyers.”

Meanwhile, Treasurer Joe Hockey has refused to rule out any changes to negative gearing and other tax concessions for investors.

Mr Hockey said the government was “very concerned” for first home buyers finding it hard to gain entry into the property market.

“One of the big areas of response is going to be supply and I'm also going to raise that with the [state] treasurers in the next couple of weeks,” Mr Hockey said.

“There are many other suggestions on the table and we welcome the input, but I'm not giving guarantees now.”

[Related: Scrap negative gearing at your peril, REIA warns]

default

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!

Comments (3)

  • <p>Australia's population is set to near on double by 2050 and without investors who is going to push the building activity?&lt;br /&gt;Majority of our population growth is going to come from immigration and when they arrive in Australia are they all in a position to buy their own home... No!&lt;br /&gt;So unless if the government wants to get back into providing low cost housing, which most state governments are selling these properties, hoping the NRAS takes up the slack. So how do you fill the shortage? Rely on Investors, which if the incentive is not there will simply put their money elsewhere to get a better return.&lt;br /&gt;President Clinton wanted more home ownership in the US, which saw 1% home loans given out to the masses and the GFC followed. So we need to be mindful that every decision has ramifications. &lt;br /&gt;A thought... Reduce the tax deductibility on investment loan interest by 50% and allow home owners to claim 50% tax deductibility on their bank interest.</p>
    0
  • <p>Why do these so called experts think that Negative Gearing is the problem?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do they not realise that Mum &amp; Dad investors have long memories, and that they are still trying to recoup the money they lost in the share market during the GFC.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Have the "Geniuses" forgotten about the old saying "once bitten, twice shy"?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most Mum &amp; Dad investors are ignoring the share market because of the hurt they are still feeling from the GFC. They look at their house and see that it hasn't varied much, and if you live in Sydney it's grown.&lt;br /&gt;Why wouldn't they want to invest in property?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Don't blame property or negative gearing, blame the financial geniuses behind the destruction that was the GFC.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And from memory, the guys in charge of that space, ASIC &amp; APRA, are now trying to stand guard over the Residential Property market!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Does anyone else see a problem here ???&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And no, it's not Negative Gearing !!</p>
    0
  • <p>When are you going to let this go. Can you imagine the consequences to the finance and property industries if changes were made? The Govt tried scrapping it previously and we had a major meltdown with property values. Investors put their money into property because its far more stable than most investment vehicles. The banks and govt alike know this. leave it alone - we get minor benefits now but pay dearly when the property is sold. I think the tax paying community is getting compensated handsomely for any minor benefits we get with negative gearing.</p>
    0
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is MB. Only files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
magazine
Read the latest issue of The Adviser magazine!
The Adviser is the number one magazine for Australia's finance and mortgage brokers. The publications delivers news, analysis, business intelligence, sales and marketing strategies, research and key target reports to an audience of professional mortgage and finance brokers
Read more
You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content, or become a PREMIUM MEMBER to enjoy a wide range of benefits